From owner-freebsd-net Tue Oct 24 11:29:47 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CBD337B661; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:29:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e9OITYn87779; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 12:29:34 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id MAA17470; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 12:29:33 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010241829.MAA17470@harmony.village.org> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Cc: Jordan Hubbard , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 22 Oct 2000 15:39:57 PDT." <20001022153957.A4742@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20001022153957.A4742@dragon.nuxi.com> <81966.972151537@winston.osd.bsdi.com> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 12:29:33 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <20001022153957.A4742@dragon.nuxi.com> "David O'Brien" writes: : At BSDcon Luke M showed me what the NetBSD 1.5 rc files look like. : They've moved them all to /etc/rc.d/ and made them very granular (as : SVR4, but w/o leading numbers in the filenames). The NetBSD : implementation also solved all the issues people have brought up in the : past -- dependacies, etc... : : We should just move to using their rc code. I agree. I've been using them for a while on my dog slow Windows CE machine. There were some minor issues when they were first committed to NetBSD on some platforms (due to a too early use of ps and some brokeness in ps on pmax, for example), but these were quickly resolved. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message