From owner-freebsd-security  Tue Jan 23 23:19:13 1996
Return-Path: owner-security
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id XAA03940
          for security-outgoing; Tue, 23 Jan 1996 23:19:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from schizo.cdsnet.net (schizo.cdsnet.net [204.118.244.32])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id XAA03934
          for <security@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 23 Jan 1996 23:19:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from mrcpu@localhost) by schizo.cdsnet.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id XAA01501; Tue, 23 Jan 1996 23:18:59 -0800
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 1996 23:18:58 -0800 (PST)
From: Jaye Mathisen <mrcpu@cdsnet.net>
To: Nathan Lawson <nlawson@statler.csc.calpoly.edu>
cc: Petri Helenius <pete@sms.fi>, security@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Ownership of files/tcp_wrappers port
In-Reply-To: <199601232010.MAA11051@statler.csc.calpoly.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960123231747.349k-100000@schizo.cdsnet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-security@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk



I submit that BSD/OS has been shipping with tcp wrappers for some time 
now, and nary a complaint that I have seen on any list.

They provide a config for no wrappers, where you just replace inetd.conf
with one already setup for no wrappers, and that's it.

No muss, no fuss, and bloat for a dinky program like that is probably a 
severe overstatement.