From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 11 21:42:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C93A116A4CF for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 21:42:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79CED43D39 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 21:42:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nocmonkey@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 77so210121rnl for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 14:42:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.11.79 with SMTP id 79mr2177980rnk; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 14:42:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:42:38 -0400 From: Danny To: Marc Fonvieille In-Reply-To: <20040811203550.GD82824@abigail.blackend.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20040811203550.GD82824@abigail.blackend.org> cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Alternative to "get"? Trying to download a file via HTTP (Solved via fetch) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 21:42:43 -0000 On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 22:35:50 +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 04:29:11PM -0400, Danny wrote: > > I am running FreeBSD 4.9R. My goal is to download an .tar.gz file from > > an HTTP site? > > > > I thought "get" would do that, but it's not installed (unless the > > command is not get). > > > > Any suggestions? > > > > fetch is what you want (fetch is in the base system). Thank you Marc and everyone else who responded. I had forgotten about fetch. :) It obviously worked like a dream. ...D