From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 22 19:55:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5E33106566C; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:55:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brde@optusnet.com.au) Received: from mail07.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail07.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ABF38FC14; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:55:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c122-106-165-191.carlnfd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au (c122-106-165-191.carlnfd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [122.106.165.191]) by mail07.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p5MJtJDV030637 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 23 Jun 2011 05:55:20 +1000 Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 05:55:19 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@besplex.bde.org To: Edward Tomasz Napierala In-Reply-To: <201106221759.p5MHxrDx060648@svn.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20110623054328.V1770@besplex.bde.org> References: <201106221759.p5MHxrDx060648@svn.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r223429 - head/sbin/growfs X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:55:22 -0000 On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, Edward Tomasz Napierala wrote: > Log: > Cosmetic fixes; mostly s/file system/filesystem/g and removing weird indent > from messages. The first part seems backwards. It undoes the 2002 change that does s/filesystem/file system/g, except the 2002 change was not restricted to growfs. 'file system' seems best English in most contexts, but not all, so such changes should not be done mechanically. 'filesystem' might be best German or Danish. I like to use 'file system' for individual file systems, but `filesystem' for things like the handler of a file system. But I don't like renaming things and wouldn't touch this :-). > Modified: head/sbin/growfs/growfs.8 > ============================================================================== > --- head/sbin/growfs/growfs.8 Wed Jun 22 17:55:16 2011 (r223428) > +++ head/sbin/growfs/growfs.8 Wed Jun 22 17:59:53 2011 (r223429) > @@ -37,12 +37,12 @@ > .\" $TSHeader: src/sbin/growfs/growfs.8,v 1.3 2000/12/12 19:31:00 tomsoft Exp $ > .\" $FreeBSD$ > .\" > -.Dd May 8, 2011 > +.Dd June 22, 2011 > .Dt GROWFS 8 > .Os > .Sh NAME > .Nm growfs > -.Nd grow size of an existing UFS file system > +.Nd expand an existing UFS filesystem Also, UFS doesn't exist. See ffs(7), the fastfs paper in /usr/share/doc, and ufs(nonexistent). I would use 'file system' here since it is an individual file system being expanded, and 'filesystem' for the ffs filesystem implementation. Bruce