From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Oct 21 11:14: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from chickasaw.gate.net (chickasaw.gate.net [198.206.134.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A3B514F6D for ; Thu, 21 Oct 1999 11:13:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wjm@gate.net) Received: from dakota.gate.net (wjm@dakota.gate.net [199.227.0.13]) by chickasaw.gate.net (8.8.6/8.6.12) with ESMTP id OAA138832 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 1999 14:13:37 -0400 Received: from localhost (wjm@localhost) by dakota.gate.net (8.8.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA37014 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 1999 14:13:56 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: dakota.gate.net: wjm owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 21 Oct 1999 14:13:56 -0400 (EDT) From: William Melanson To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Virus after install? In-Reply-To: <002d01bf1be3$e2a12140$8457f7c7@manager.ssimicro.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 21 Oct 1999, Allan Ross wrote: % % Turn off boot sector scanning? I think not. Does it not make FAR more % sense to have a representative of the FreeBSD team contact Symantec % and request that they add the profile of booteasy to its database so % that it is properly identified and reported? % No... If the good people at Symantec are commercial vendors of said sotfware (which of course they are). It is they who should take the liberty of contacting the appropriate bsd representatives in regards to their anti-virus, multi-platform functionality (or lac thereof). To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message