From owner-freebsd-chat  Tue Oct 14 08:47:37 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id IAA25341
          for chat-outgoing; Tue, 14 Oct 1997 08:47:37 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat)
Received: from fps.biblos.unal.edu.co ([168.176.37.11])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id IAA25318
          for <chat@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 14 Oct 1997 08:47:11 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co)
Received: from localhost by fps.biblos.unal.edu.co (AIX 4.1/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA20108; Tue, 14 Oct 1997 10:37:20 -0500
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1997 10:37:20 -0500 (EST)
From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" <pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co>
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: C2 Trusted FreeBSD? 
In-Reply-To: <1075.876842702@time.cdrom.com>
Message-Id: <Pine.A41.3.95.971014102955.2174A-100000@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 14 Oct 1997, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:

> 
> I was actually talking about low-level nuclear strikes on Russia,
> which is what the B2 was designed for.  Vietnam?  I think you're a bit
> behind the times.  There was this "cold war" thing which followed it
> and dictated a lot of american strategic thinking.  :-)
>
Ooops I was thinking about another B, well...all the B* have the same
philosophy, and similar budgets associated with them ;-). 
Anyway, if there was another nam-like war I have no doubt the results
would be the same...
Money in weapons is lost money, but of course I don't believe that crap
about making love to your enemy :-).

	Pedro.