From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 3 17:12:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05BAA4C4; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 17:12:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDE18211A; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 17:12:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.22] (unknown [130.255.19.191]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C6643B4A; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 12:11:58 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <538E01CB.1050607@marino.st> Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 19:11:39 +0200 From: John Marino Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ulrich_Sp=F6rlein?= , David Chisnall Subject: Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla References: <92E4FB10-DDC8-4B3E-9242-4E8494491630@FreeBSD.org> <538DBAEC.5060905@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Vitaly Magerya X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 17:12:25 -0000 On 6/3/2014 18:57, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > 2014-06-03 14:16 GMT+02:00 David Chisnall : > > A mood point for me, as I'll need a full account, but the Project should > not make reporting bugs harder than it is already ... have you considered > using reCATPCHA or something to fend of at least some of the spam? Both ineffective and highly annoying continuously, not just one time like registration is. If there's a vote between captcha-any-flavor and registration, I'll vote for the latter every single time. I'm with Chisnall - it's doubtful most folks unwilling to register are about to make a meaningful report. And it's pretty much the standard today. What can you still post on anonymously / no registration that isn't policed by humans 24/7? Not much that I can think of. John