From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 19 02:01:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B55C1106566B for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 02:01:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wenheping@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pw0-f44.google.com (mail-pw0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78FE68FC0A for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 02:01:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pwi15 with SMTP id 15so2240050pwi.3 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:01:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=90Wvi/X/f4JuQOI1Dw+hEWbblz8urYV2RYSEoo0MzRY=; b=dT1GLHr09h5EIr9PYKNe05+C51R1x7JLMYUJL64sH2ZFgVmzoEE0mFipBFlyArMDYw J7XPtNH4ArCv6iEdVKW6RJse4CPQSmCfJUS4P2tc5NGfzzBEB/TN5EFQ1phS9mX4Fhxb BTBWijxm4TkwwK7EC86F46gKHQW+OkreuH+kQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=YL2GN2Dl/M8BPgJLJT5O/l/A99R3yEfNv+zyQ9swajho5lRZr5/8BZjeTQ80o0VT4I vku5e88EIhlSjxy6IkRMmV6sYtqHI6jp2d8gH2iaIbSkblpdNNVKinWXo2RZS8+QrVnC BJS6oLKQnGKQsHVy4oYzKL/UbXFpKCw436xsE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.26.39 with SMTP id d39mr4671476wfj.223.1263866495626; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:01:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201001182230.o0IMU9ua038362@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <201001182230.o0IMU9ua038362@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:01:35 +0800 Message-ID: <7be7a2801001181801t509e672dw937b3b1630f67d99@mail.gmail.com> From: wen heping To: Max Brazhnikov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Pengfei Ju Subject: Re: ports/142880: [REPOCOPY] chinese/stardict2-dict-zh_CN --- X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 02:01:36 -0000 On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 6:30 AM, Max Brazhnikov wrote: > The following reply was made to PR ports/142880; it has been noted by > GNATS. > > From: Max Brazhnikov > To: bug-followup@freebsd.org, jupengfei@gmail.com, wen@freebsd.org > Cc: > Subject: Re: ports/142880: [REPOCOPY] chinese/stardict2-dict-zh_CN --- > Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:22:50 +0300 > > --nextPart180621902.7ALxqGeM9T > Content-Type: Text/Plain; > charset=3D"us-ascii" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > What the reason to have the same dictionaries under different ports? Yes, it is the same dictionary. After rethinking of it =EF=BC=8C now I thin= k it is unneeded to create a new port for stardict3-dict-zh_CN. > Wouldn 't=3D20 better to remove run dependency on stardict and allow peo= ple > to use existing port for any of stardict 2/3 (or other -- not only stardi= ct > can use these dictionaries.) > Yes, it is better than to create a new port. :) But how do you think about this way: 1 REPOCOPY stardict2-dict-zh_CN--> stardict-dict-zh_CN 2 Add option entry for stardict2 or stardict3 ? wen > > Max > > --nextPart180621902.7ALxqGeM9T > Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=3Dsignature.asc > Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) > > iEYEABECAAYFAktU3z8ACgkQ+9kIwqyzzRIbugCfX3Clh5ZIwCpDFXE/CAWJ3phd > wK0AoIOjbza+ZXUvOxM+cG/GqSjWr/n0 > =3DXnNg > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > --nextPart180621902.7ALxqGeM9T-- >