From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 4 00:34:31 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84F17C3F; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 00:34:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613822BF7; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 00:34:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 9070656163; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 19:34:30 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 19:34:30 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: Eitan Adler Subject: Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla Message-ID: <20140604003430.GB18109@lonesome.com> References: <92E4FB10-DDC8-4B3E-9242-4E8494491630@FreeBSD.org> <538DBAEC.5060905@gmail.com> <538E2924.3090002@gmx.de> <538E2AC9.7010309@sasktel.net> <538E32E5.5040400@marino.st> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Matthias Andree , marino@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Stephen Hurd X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 00:34:31 -0000 On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 01:50:23PM -0700, Eitan Adler wrote: > > I don't concede killing anonymous means killing trivial bug reporting, > > but if that was the case: Oh well, I guess we have to focus on > > non-trivial bugs. > > Trivial bugs are important too. I'll echo eadler a bit here, but with a different emphasis. What _I_ consider a trivial bug is based on my own past experiences with FreeBSD. Someone who is new to it and is submitting their first bug may not see it as trivial. We don't wish to discourage them. Discouraging people from contributing is counterproductive. We need more contributors, not less. I know for certain that people in the past have given up after submitting PRs that were never answered. While I know we don't have the manpower to deal with all of them, that should at least be our ideal. mcl