From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Dec 28 13:08:37 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6028F16A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 28 Dec 2003 13:08:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ms-smtp-02-eri0.socal.rr.com (ms-smtp-02-qfe0.socal.rr.com
	[66.75.162.134])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74B1943D41
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 28 Dec 2003 13:08:36 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from sean@mcneil.com)
Received: from server.mcneil.com (cpe-66-75-176-109.socal.rr.com
	[66.75.176.109])hBSL8ZNR005383	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 28 Dec 2003 13:08:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [66.75.176.109] (mcneil.com [66.75.176.109])
	by server.mcneil.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hBSL8Yr5016672
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 28 Dec 2003 13:08:35 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from sean@mcneil.com)
From: Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1072645714.59475.6.camel@server.mcneil.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 13:08:34 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-DCC-Servercave-Metrics: server.mcneil.com 1183; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 18:30:48 -0800
Subject: suspicious top output with ULE scheduler
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 21:08:37 -0000

Hi all,

I just tried out the new ULE scheduler and I'm noticing an odd behavior
of top.  It looks like it is assigning CPU usage not only to the process
that is actually using it but to the parent processes as well.  If I
perform a 'portupgrade -a', for instance, I see many processes with the
exact same percentage of CPU and they all look like parent processes
(make, sh, etc.).  It doesn't look right, but perhaps what I'm seeing is
actually the case.

Am I suppose to buildworld/installworld after I install a new kernel
with the ULE scheduler?  I wouldn't think so.

Cheers,
Sean