From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 30 10:50:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 489D916A41F for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 10:50:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from John.Marshall@riverwillow.com.au) Received: from mail2.riverwillow.net.au (ns2.riverwillow.net.au [203.58.93.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3CD343D55 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 10:50:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from John.Marshall@riverwillow.com.au) Received: from rwmail.riverwillow.net.au (rwsrv06.rw2.riverwillow.net.au [172.25.25.16]) by mail2.riverwillow.net.au (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j8UAoVRZ039721; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 20:50:34 +1000 (AEST) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 20:50:31 +1000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Message-ID: <9F7B653A50CF3D45A92C05401046239B059A76@rwsrv06.rw2.riverwillow.net.au> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Add ntpdate_hosts to rc.conf Thread-Index: AcXEGsg3fM9sqOTqRxWwVMyOd/0EkABjfA7g From: "John Marshall" To: "Alex Zbyslaw" Cc: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Add ntpdate_hosts to rc.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 10:50:39 -0000 > Is there a reason you are using ntpdate rather than ntpd? ntpdate is=20 > supposedly deprecated and ntpd can do what ntpdate does: >=20 > -q Exit the ntpd just after the first time the clock is set. This > behavior mimics that of the ntpdate(8) program, which is to be > retired. The -g and -x options can be used with this option. >=20 > --Alex Perhaps a better question, along the same lines, would be, Why does the FreeBSD RC system use ntpdate? If the idea is to disappear the ntpdate phase from startup, then let's ditch it and add the -g flag as default for ntpd_flags. If ntpdate is staying, for the time being, then it can't hurt to add a missing defaults variable, can it? John.