From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jul  3 09:33:14 1996
Return-Path: owner-stable
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA21013
          for stable-outgoing; Wed, 3 Jul 1996 09:33:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from haven.uniserve.com (haven.uniserve.com [198.53.215.121])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA21000;
          Wed, 3 Jul 1996 09:33:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by haven.uniserve.com id <32100-23944>; Wed, 3 Jul 1996 09:36:43 -0800
Date: 	Wed, 3 Jul 1996 09:36:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tom Samplonius <tom@uniserve.com>
To: "Pedro F. Giffuni S." <pgiffuni@biblioteca.campus.unal.edu.co>
cc: Matt Bartley <mbartley@lear35.cytex.com>, security@freebsd.org,
        stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: What is known about The security hole
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A32.3.91.960703102610.30718B-100000@biblioteca.campus.unal.edu.co>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960703093423.13469A-100000@haven.uniserve.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 3 Jul 1996, Pedro F. Giffuni S. wrote:

> I would suggest having smrsh included by default in sendmail's configuration 
> in new releases, and immediate upgrades in sendmail and BIND.

  I'd also like to add that CERT issued an advisory about Sendmail 8.6.12 
several months ago.  Either 8.6.13 or 8.7.5 is recommended.

Tom