From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 3 08:21:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3394516A403; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 08:21:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org) Received: from relay-er5.mbrd.ru (relay-er5.mbrd.ru [194.117.71.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F56943D53; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 08:21:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org) Received: from msd.mbrd.ru ([172.16.33.193]) by relay-er5.mbrd.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.x) id 1FxJfl-000MQ5-2s; Mon, 03 Jul 2006 12:20:49 +0400 Message-ID: <44A8D361.7040808@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 12:20:49 +0400 From: Sergey Matveychuk User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hajimu UMEMOTO References: <003201c69e25$43b56de0$6508280a@tocnet28.jspoj.czf> <44A8AFB7.5030304@FreeBSD.org> <20060703060759.GB51623@snoozy.vdgrift.org> <44A8B61C.6010003@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, dandee@volny.cz Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: portupgrade-2.1.3.2, 2 - help me please, the port in short time is broken again, what does it all mean ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 08:21:04 -0000 Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > Hi, > >>>>>> On Mon, 03 Jul 2006 10:15:56 +0400 >>>>>> Sergey Matveychuk said: > > sem> See my HANDS-UP message a couples days ago at the list. > sem> Old (<=2.1.1,2) portupgrade use wrong (may be a right word will - > sem> "unexpected") database format. > > I don't think that old portupgrade uses wrong database format. You > changed the default version of Berkeley DB, silently: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/sysutils/portupgrade/Makefile.diff?r1=1.224&r2=1.225 > > It broke backward compatibility of .db files. You should be meant I forgot add an entry to UPDATING? Yes, I forgot it. I'll do. -- Dixi. Sem.