From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Mar 6 12:18: 0 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from gidgate.gid.co.uk (gid.co.uk [194.32.164.225]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F29D137B404 for ; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 12:17:48 -0800 (PST) Received: (from rb@localhost) by gidgate.gid.co.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g26KH2g07463; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 20:17:02 GMT (envelope-from rb) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20020306201110.00c125b0@gid.co.uk> X-Sender: rbmail@gid.co.uk X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 20:16:56 +0000 To: Wes Peters From: Bob Bishop Subject: Re: Sorting and Matching options for ls(1) Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <3C862030.9080108@softweyr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, At 13:57 06/03/02 +0000, Wes Peters wrote: >At the request of several FreeBSD users, I have developed the following >two options for ls(1): [etc] I have given up flaming for Lent, so I have no opinion about the worth of the proposal :-) :-) However, if you are going to do it, what about b sort by number of blocks allocated (cf ls -s) i sort by inode number (cf ls -i) -- Bob Bishop +44 (0)118 977 4017 rb@gid.co.uk fax +44 (0)118 989 4254 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message