From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jul 24 23:30: 8 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail17.messagelabs.com (mail17.messagelabs.com [62.231.131.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 971B837B406 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 23:29:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rdls@satamatics.com) X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 14176 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2001 06:28:31 -0000 Received: from smtp-5.star.net.uk (212.125.75.74) by server-5.tower-17.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 25 Jul 2001 06:28:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 7190 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2001 06:29:58 -0000 Received: from unallocated.star.net.uk (HELO ns.hq.satamatics.net) (62.231.144.7) by smtp-5.star.net.uk with SMTP; 25 Jul 2001 06:29:58 -0000 Received: from matrix.satamatics.net (matrix.satamatics.net [10.24.1.1]) by ns.hq.satamatics.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f6P7XQu06651 for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 07:33:26 GMT (envelope-from rdls@satamatics.com) Subject: RE: applixware Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 07:29:34 +0100 Message-ID: <703AB71471B6024CB86D219058DB64FB02E14A@matrix.satamatics.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Has-Attach: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: applixware Thread-Index: AcEU0GBqa+20yxdYSPOFfk5u6PHY3gAAkQBg From: "Richard Smith" To: "Mike Meyer" content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4417.0 Cc: Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG From: Mike Meyer [mailto:mwm@mired.org] > Richard Smith types: > > > From: Mike Meyer [mailto:mwm@mired.org] > > > Richard Smith types: > > > > > #include > > > > > int getresuid(uid_t *a, uid_t *b, uid_t *c) { return 1; } > > > > Pretty, but: > > > > int getresuid(uid_t *, uid_t *, uid_t *) { return 1; } > > > > would be better. I don't like sloppy code either ;-) > > > That doesn't compile for me - it complains about the=20 > paramenter name > > > being omitted. I agree that it would be better to omit=20 > them, but the > > > compiler won't let me. If you can tell me how to make it=20 > do that, I'd > > > appreciate it. > > Would you beleive it? The reason I adopted the practice of omitting > > unused > > parameters in the first place, was because the compiler=20 > used to warn me=20 > > about it (this was back in the 3.x days).=20 > >=20 > > I've just discovered that the version of cc/gcc (2.95.3)=20 > that comes with > >=20 > > 4.3-RELEASE doesn't care if I do or I don't, (with any -W=20 > settings) :-/ > >=20 > > So which compiler/version are you using? >=20 > What was on 4-STABLE as of late June. It identifies itself as > 2.95.3. I'm not using any -W switch, and trying "-Wall" doesn't change > anything. Intriguing. What's the exact command line + file + error message? -- Richard Smith Network Systems Director Satamatics Ltd Green Lane, Tewkesbury, GL20 8HD, United Kingdom Tel: +44 1684 278610 Fax: +44 1684 278611 _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message