From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 5 19:00:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9797A10656C8 for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2010 19:00:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C02C8FC1A for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2010 19:00:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o85J0NLE072382 for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2010 19:00:23 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o85J0Nxr072364; Sun, 5 Sep 2010 19:00:23 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 19:00:23 GMT Message-Id: <201009051900.o85J0Nxr072364@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Garrett Wollman Cc: Subject: Re: ports/150235: sysutils/smartmontools build system bug X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Garrett Wollman List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2010 19:00:23 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/150235; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Garrett Wollman To: Alex Samorukov Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, developers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/150235: sysutils/smartmontools build system bug Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 14:53:10 -0400 < said: > Very funny. I don`t think so. Try to argue your position next time, > this may help. Only if someone is willing to actually engage in an argument. > BTW - this "bug" was in smartmontools from early beginning and only > you hit this condition - i think that is very good indicator of its > importance, isn`t it? A bug is a bug. > Your commit will break smartmontools functionality, as i mentioned > before. Thats why i`m against it. Try to read before posting. What commit? I haven't committed anything. > The required file was never included in the /usr/include. And it was > changed more then once from the beginning. If anything in userland links against a kernel header, then that header needs to be installed in /usr/include, end of story. -I/usr/src/sys is never acceptable in userland code. > You can troll this way as long as you want. And of course, you VERY need > to upgrade smartmontools in the middle of the system upgrade cycle. Of course one needs to upgrade all ports in the middle of the upgrade cycle, if one wishes to have a working system at the end of it -- particularly in the case of something that uses CAMIOCOMMAND, which does not have any backwards-compatibility mechanism (hmmm, another bug here). -GAWollman