From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Apr 25 21:04:31 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E191340
 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 21:04:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1B991720
 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 21:04:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from nine.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102])
 by smtp-int.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id E61A86AC7
 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 21:04:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by nine.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001)
 id 27DCD31238; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 23:04:32 +0200 (CEST)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: OpenSSL static analysis, was: De Raadt + FBSD + OpenSSH + hole?
References: <DC2F9726-881B-4D42-879F-61377CA0210D@mac.com>
 <8783.1398202137@server1.tristatelogic.com>
 <20140423003400.GA8271@glaze.hydra>
 <20140423010054.2891E143D098@rock.dv.isc.org>
 <20140423012206.GB8271@glaze.hydra> <86bnvpoav7.fsf@nine.des.no>
 <CAG5KPzyTCTbe_vTcP8HDa_KU0agNZQjzVmQ4XnZZjgGFEVnyaQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <86zjj9mivi.fsf@nine.des.no> <20140425175056.GA8508@glaze.hydra>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 23:04:32 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20140425175056.GA8508@glaze.hydra> (Chad Perrin's message of
 "Fri, 25 Apr 2014 11:50:56 -0600")
Message-ID: <86iopxm87z.fsf@nine.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]"
 <freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-security>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 21:04:31 -0000

Chad Perrin <code@apotheon.net> writes:
> Do you claim that the Clang static analyzer is essentially worthless for
> finding and fixing security-related bugs because it is more trouble to
> make use of its output than its output is worth, or does it only *seem*
> like that is your claim?

All I was saying is that 70% of this thread is pointless and that some
of the most active participants are talking out of their asses.

I won't address the wall of text in your previous reply except to note
that you misrepresented my position and argued against a claim I never
made.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no