From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May 27 17:12:50 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBCDD1065A5D
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 27 May 2009 17:12:50 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from psteele@webmail.maxiscale.com)
Received: from k2smtpout04-01.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net
	(k2smtpout04-01.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.189.166])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 96FE08FC23
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 27 May 2009 17:12:50 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from psteele@webmail.maxiscale.com)
Received: (qmail 30761 invoked from network); 27 May 2009 17:12:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO owa.webmail.maxiscale.com) (72.167.52.135)
	by k2smtpout04-01.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.189.166) with
	ESMTP; 27 May 2009 17:12:49 -0000
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 10:12:49 -0700
Message-ID: <B8A480488C0C6849826655761349EA4338DA@owa.webmail.maxiscale.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: Is this a gmirror bug?
Thread-Index: AcneV+Tk8/CRr+7tRWKtomK7n84IRAAliXXA
References: <B8A480488C0C6849826655761349EA4338D4@owa.webmail.maxiscale.com><alpine.BSF.2.00.0905262333080.48107@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl><20090526230522.GH49013@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu>
	<20090527011302.98954329.freebsd@edvax.de>
From: "Peter Steele" <psteele@webmail.maxiscale.com>
To: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: RE: Is this a gmirror bug?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 17:12:52 -0000

>Wouldn't it look like
>
>Filesystem          1K-blocks      Used     Avail Capacity  Mounted on
>/dev/mirror/gm0d      4058062   -377792   4111210   110%    /tmp
>/dev/mirror/gm0e     15231278   -113942  14126718   101%    /var
>
>then? I always assumed that a disk occupation > 100% would go into
>this reserved area, which would turn the Capacity field to be more
>than 100%, and not less than 0%? This is the case when I have more
>data on a UFS partition than it "is allowed to"...

I've seen this before a few times, but never something less than 0%.
I've reimaged the system to correct it. Will have to see if it happens
again...