From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 31 09:59:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD13216A420 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:59:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from outbackdingo@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 941A313C44B for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:59:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from outbackdingo@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so936141waf.3 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 01:59:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ilUn4WPaPtAydVF+Y1MpiXJlHFO2Mogm0Ak1ek4ONmg=; b=FIxN6G5XvIs2vSElrM81rEYoBEANM7ZR9lOUY8Avb30TeInDy1J7Rv8iKokkbZdxBvWb4S9MT4aLstsnetcEXc74vIU/3xaW9eJfWUoF4VjaA4IsI6rwhjzr8qqt5PfXSzpdRkfdwR2iq+OzogFv2KuI8I4SZyUwU9A0EoyrZ9Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=IbUVK4oQs6OMx7gDEv6xv/G+wIWE7sdEtDmXb3eyeD793DguTtG8U36BoN68sgUtI6nFynkpF18fa0ctHlRzstcbVcNkC23dm4QM8gscQ8LPUrK9x2K+GPIgBxs8cLCHBXIijjKX54t3wAzOnXdrbnQBFgk5+gLwSQOWUEmvNkE= Received: by 10.114.209.1 with SMTP id h1mr2127145wag.115.1201771870008; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 01:31:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.2? ( [124.157.245.94]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m31sm3063299wag.28.2008.01.31.01.31.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 31 Jan 2008 01:31:08 -0800 (PST) From: OutBackDingo To: Julian Elischer In-Reply-To: <47A18EDA.4040501@elischer.org> References: <78cb3d3f0801302245v2183c613t6ecdd9acebbe9ef7@mail.gmail.com> <47A1700B.3090406@gmail.com> <47A18EDA.4040501@elischer.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 01:30:21 +0800 Message-Id: <1201800621.7849.8.camel@myhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, "Aryeh M. Friedman" , Adrian Penisoara Subject: Re: [OT] Q: what would you choose for a VCS today X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:59:21 -0000 > I'm having to use mercurial. > I'm not really enjoying it. > works ok for small projects. BSD is a bit big for it. > doe work foe offline editing, but loses all your BSD history. > > probably SVK is the way to go from what I hear. Im using mercurial on full FreeBSD trees, curiosity makes me ask where do you the deficiency? Ive had no issues patching, branching, merging, transplanting, tracking vendor updates. The only issue i really had was a import of the full cvs tree