From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Sep 24 2:47: 5 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from balmung.jeje.org (none.jeje.org [212.129.62.129]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC51437B411 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 02:47:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sauron.admin.in.none.net (jeje.eng.freesbee.net [212.129.2.30]) by balmung.jeje.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DB0E10971F for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 11:53:23 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 11:46:55 +0200 From: Jerome Fleury To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CVSup sources Message-ID: <99060000.1001324815@sauron.admin.in.none.net> In-Reply-To: <20010923234743.A91162@student.uu.se> References: <22950000.1001062154@sauron.admin.in.none.net> <3BAE542B.99CE349F@owt.com> <20010923234743.A91162@student.uu.se> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.0 (SunOS/SPARC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --On Sunday, September 23, 2001 11:47:44 PM +0200 Erik Trulsson wrote: >> That doesn't matter. It is the tag= that matters. If you are using >> tag=RELENG_4, you will build a system that identifies itself as >> >> FreeBSD crystal 4.4-STABLE FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE > > That doesn't matter either. > The RELENG_4 branch *does* have BASE=4.3 in release/Makefile, and, yes, > that probably should be 4.4. I guess the reason why it isn't is simply > because nobody remembered to update it. > > That variable doesn't seem to affect the output of uname anyway. > My reading is that that variable is only used when doing a 'make > release' and then only if you do not specify the release name manually. > So it doesn't appear to be anything to worry much about. Thanks for your answers (you and Ken). Seen this ? It has been updated :) -- Jerome Fleury To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message