From owner-freebsd-chat  Sun Apr 18  9:24:33 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.nostrum.com (mail.nostrum.com [206.28.8.254])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 53E0B1507F; Sun, 18 Apr 1999 09:24:29 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from pckizer@nostrum.com)
Received: (from pckizer@localhost)
	by mail.nostrum.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) id LAA25698;
	Sun, 18 Apr 1999 11:22:02 -0500
Message-Id: <199904181622.LAA25698@mail.nostrum.com>
From: Philip Kizer <pckizer@nostrum.com>
To: advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG, chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Charles Henrich a Star? 
X-Reposting-Policy: redistribute only with permission
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 13 Apr 1999 00:49:49 PDT."
             <58590.923989789@zippy.cdrom.com> 
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 11:22:02 -0500
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


"Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> wrote:
>"Movie FX company chooses FreeBSD for overall reliability"
>
>Then in the article you can have a paragraph saying how Linux was
>evaluated and FreeBSD chosen instead, even though the renderman binary
>was a Linux one.  Even if it just states reasons of personal
>preference for this, it's fine.  Just so long as it's not in the
>headline or makes claims that Linux is somehow less reliable in
>general (stating a preference is not the same as making bold claims),
>we're fine.

Is there a press release yet for that one to which we can point people?
I'm mainly asking in relation to the latest User Friendly...I was about to
pen a quick note to illiad, but was hoping for some "official" information:

  http://www.userfriendly.org/cartoons/archives/99apr/19990418.html


-philip

-- 
AKA: Philip Kizer <pckizer@tamu.edu>
Texas A&M CIS Operating Systems Group, Unix


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message