From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Nov 25 13:11:57 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3C2D37B401 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:11:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from greendale.ukc.ac.uk (greendale.ukc.ac.uk [129.12.21.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC16143E4A for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:11:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from P.A.Osborne@ukc.ac.uk) Received: from myrtle.ukc.ac.uk ([129.12.3.176] ident=root) by greendale.ukc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #4) id 18GQVr-0001Z7-00; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 21:11:27 +0000 Received: from pao by myrtle.ukc.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.36 #1) id 18GQVr-0002d5-00; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 21:11:27 +0000 Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 21:11:27 +0000 From: "P.A.Osborne" To: Wes Peters Cc: "P.A.Osborne" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ThinkPad R31 - Lucent windmodem woes.... Message-ID: <20021125211127.GB9381@myrtle.ukc.ac.uk> References: <20021125105914.B240@luthien.ukc.ac.uk> <3DE247B8.26B557AE@softweyr.com> <20021125172600.GA20073@banyan.ukc.ac.uk> <3DE26A9B.2A718BC0@softweyr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3DE26A9B.2A718BC0@softweyr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-UKC-Mail-System: No virus detected Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 10:23:23AM -0800, Wes Peters wrote: > > If I *knew* what device it really mapped to then I would be laughing, > > finding that out seems to be nigh on impossible, hence my mail asking > > if anyone had been round these hoops and succeeded. > > The last time I tried ltmdm (quite some time ago) it seemed to take the > first non-allocated sio, which would be sio2 in your case. It's at least > a good starting point. Ok I will give that a go in a bit, thanks. > > That is something that I don't want to do until I am certain that the > > winmodem is not an option. > > If you do get it working you're not likely to be impressed by the through- > put or the load imposed on your system. I certainly wasn't. Thats kind of what I am expecting mainly die to the bad press (with good reason) in the past. However the modem runs find under WinXP with no noticeable major increase in load on the CPU - hence I dont't want to buy a real modem unless I have to. Paul To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message