From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jan 28 14:59:41 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA12998 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Wed, 28 Jan 1998 14:59:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA12977 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 1998 14:59:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: (from asami@localhost) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) id OAA14686; Wed, 28 Jan 1998 14:59:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 1998 14:59:15 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199801282259.OAA14686@vader.cs.berkeley.edu> To: pfgiffun@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co CC: kuku@gilberto.physik.RWTH-Aachen.DE, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: (pfgiffun@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co) Subject: Re: /x11/FWF (fwf-3.8) From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * Please label that port BROKEN..it is very outdated to be useful anyway I'd have done that a long time ago if it didn't build occasionally, and it isn't used by two other ports (audio/xgmod and graphics/aero). Will people scream if I mark all three broken? Satoshi