From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Sep 7 11:35:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from iraun2.uka.de (iraun2.uka.de [129.13.10.91]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E12837B401 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 11:35:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from i30nb2.ira.uka.de ([129.13.30.52]) by iraun2.uka.de with esmtp (Exim 3.30 #2 (Debian)) id 15fQTc-000149-00 for ; Fri, 07 Sep 2001 20:35:40 +0200 Received: (from esk@localhost) by i30nb2.ira.uka.de (8.11.5/8.11.3) id f87IZUF71429; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 20:35:30 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from esk) From: Espen Skoglund MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15257.4977.549494.312541@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 20:35:29 +0200 To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: WANT_GNOME gives unwanted CONFIGURE_ARGS X-Mailer: VM 6.92 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I was just looking at ports/30414, and it seems there are some unexpected (at least for me) results of defining WANT_GNOME in the port's Makefile. I would expect bsd.gnome.mk to include a proper --datadir switch to the configure script, but .if !defined(HAVE_GNOME) && ... CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--datadir=${PREFIX}/share/gnome .endif on line 287 ensures that this does not happen because WANT_GNOME will (potentially) define HAVE_GNOME=yes. Have I missed something here? eSk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message