From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 21 13:32:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A58F16A41F for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 13:32:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C9E543D46 for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 13:32:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id j7LDYJb39562; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 06:34:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: , "Daniel Gonzalez" , Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 06:32:26 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20050821122904.1880.qmail@web33315.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: FXP driver.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 13:32:33 -0000 I have a FreeBSD system running on an Intel brand motherboard with a 945G chipset - while it doesen't do the thing with the pings he's talking about, take a look at the following dmesg snippet: sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio0: port may not be enabled sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A However, despite this the serial port does work. I always thought this was some harmless bug in the sio code but I wonder now if these problems are related and it's a bug in the chipset driver in FreeBSD. Could you post your entire dmesg output, please? Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Danial Thom >Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2005 5:29 AM >To: Daniel Gonzalez; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: RE: FXP driver.... > > >Thats the sort of thing that happens when >interrupts aren't working. > >Danial > >--- Ted Mittelstaedt >wrote: > >> what about a ping from the 845G to the labbox, >> does that do >> the same thing? >> >> Ted >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On >> Behalf Of Daniel Gonzalez >> >Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 11:12 AM >> >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >Subject: FXP driver.... >> > >> > >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I've build a new P4 box (1.8Ghz, 512MB mem) >> based upon a ASUS P4B533VM >> >> motherboard. This board has an Intel 845G >> chipset and onboard 10/100 >> >> mbit/s LAN (fxp driver). >> >> >> >> When connected directly to a gateway (in my >> case an Extreme BD10k) I >> >> observe the following behaviour: a ping to >> the gateway starts around >> >> 1ms and slowly increases in steps of .1 or >> .2ms to around 10ms. Then >> >> it suddenly drops back to 1ms and the >> process starts all over again. >> >> >> >> I've tried a different NIC (3com, xl >> driver), new cabling, new >> >> switchport and all gives me the same result. >> My other labbox (a AMD >> >> 2000 XP+ with 3com PCI nic) connected to the >> same router is showing >> >> normal latency. This gives me the feeling >> it's some sort of timing >> >> issue on the P4's motherboard itself. >> >> >> >> Has anyone seen this before? I've searched >> the archives and found >> >> little on this topic. Any tips/hints where I >> can seach for further >> >> clues? >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> >> Arjan >> >> >> > >> >I haven't used the fxp driver in a while but >> you can check out >> >the man page >> >for the driver (man 4 fxp) and it mentions >> that you can disable >> >autoselect >> >for media type and speed. I remember reading >> in an article (I >> >can't locate >> >the URL) that the autonegotiation between the >> NIC and >> >switch/router can be a >> >bottleneck. That would be the easiset thing to >> check/eliminate. >> >Hope that >> >helps. >> >-- >> >Dan Gonzalez >> >spammesilly@gmail.com >> >IM: signulth >> >>_______________________________________________ >> >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > >> >-- >> >No virus found in this incoming message. >> >Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >> >Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: >> 267.10.13/78 - Release Date: >> >8/19/2005 >> > >> -- >> No virus found in this outgoing message. >> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >> Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.13/78 >> - Release Date: 8/19/2005 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > >__________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >http://mail.yahoo.com >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.13/78 - Release Date: >8/19/2005 > -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.13/78 - Release Date: 8/19/2005