From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 1 05:03:24 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B7516A589 for ; Sat, 1 Nov 2003 05:03:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from 1002-2.lowesthosting.com (1002-2.lowesthosting.com [207.44.216.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9298543FBD for ; Sat, 1 Nov 2003 05:03:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from schnoopay@mackanics.net) Received: (qmail 2315 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2003 13:03:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mackanics.net) (24.229.178.61) by 4me.cc with SMTP; 1 Nov 2003 13:03:23 -0000 Message-ID: <3FA3AF1A.9050000@mackanics.net> Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2003 08:03:22 -0500 From: Schnoopay User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031019 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Sticky mouse with SCHED_ULE 10-30-03 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2003 13:03:24 -0000 > Are you using moused? Is this SMP or UP? What CPUs are you using? > > Thanks, > Jeff I am having similar problems after my last cvsup (10-31-03) also using a USB MS Intellimouse. Mouse is slow to respond under ULE but fine under 4BSD. The mouse feels like it's being sampled at a slow rate. I am using moused, on a UP Athlon XP 1800+. I am running seti@home at nice 15, but kill the seti process made no notable difference. I failed to check objective performance as the interactive experience was truly difficult to work with and I just wanted to get my work done. =] -Schnoopay