From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 21 23:32:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF1B5106564A for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 23:32:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org) Received: from server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [87.229.73.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33BDA8FC14 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 23:32:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.mypc.hu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1F9B14E6B1E; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:17:02 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at server.mypc.hu Received: from server.mypc.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id GZtSBD1EbrJk; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:17:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.117] (catv-80-98-232-12.catv.broadband.hu [80.98.232.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BB4AC14E6A5A; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:17:00 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F1B4767.5070105@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:16:55 +0100 From: Gabor Kovesdan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0a2) Gecko/20111124 Thunderbird/10.0a2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warren Block References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tidy and HTML tab spacing X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 23:32:49 -0000 On 2012.01.18. 23:49, Warren Block wrote: > 5. Don't tidy HTML files at all (suggested as an option by Benedict > Reuschling). The unprocessed HTML is ugly, but few people are going > to look at it directly. Files that haven't been through tidy are a > little larger, about 4% in the case of the Porter's Handbook. I also think tidy should be removed. As hrs wrote, new standards should be evaluated and probably they are much better. (I think they are.) If there are some nits, then we should process it with a custom script or something, instead of this crapware. Gabor