From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 28 08:01:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE865106564A for ; Mon, 28 May 2012 08:01:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coder@tuxfamily.org) Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr (smtp3-g21.free.fr [IPv6:2a01:e0c:1:1599::12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 482478FC0A for ; Mon, 28 May 2012 08:01:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (unknown [88.184.221.231]) by smtp3-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3133A623D; Mon, 28 May 2012 10:01:15 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4FC330CA.80200@tuxfamily.org> Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 10:01:14 +0200 From: "coder.tuxfamily" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120502 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rainer Hurling References: <4FBA9620.3020207@gwdg.de> <4FBA997C.6010000@tuxfamily.org> <4FBAA203.90201@gwdg.de> <4FBAA388.1070906@tuxfamily.org> <4FBB24D3.4010209@gwdg.de> <4FBBC3F2.4050104@tuxfamily.org> <4FBBC504.5010305@gwdg.de> <4FBBD7B4.5090505@tuxfamily.org> <4FBBFADA.6010700@gwdg.de> <4FBD0797.9040803@gwdg.de> <4FBD0EE2.9050703@tuxfamily.org> <4FBD122E.9030606@gwdg.de> <4FBF4303.8020501@gwdg.de> <4FBFE2B8.5000601@tuxfamily.org> <4FBFF060.9070706@gwdg.de> <4FC0FB76.2070702@tuxfamily.org> <4FC107D7.5060905@gwdg.de> <4FC1D51C.6000404@gwdg.de> <4FC3225A.2060306@tuxfamily.org> In-Reply-To: <4FC3225A.2060306@tuxfamily.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gdal 1.9.1 (Was Re: graphics/gdal 1.9.0 does not build on CURRENT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 08:01:23 -0000 Le 28.05.2012 08:59, coder.tuxfamily a écrit : > Le 27.05.2012 09:17, Rainer Hurling a écrit : >> On 26.05.2012 18:41 (UTC+1), Rainer Hurling wrote: >>> On 26.05.2012 17:49 (UTC+2), coder.tuxfamily wrote: >>>> Le 25.05.2012 22:49, Rainer Hurling a écrit : >>>>> On 25.05.2012 21:51 (UTC+1), coder.tuxfamily wrote: >>>>>> Can you try to build the "new" port of gdal ? >>>>>> >>>>>> I have the same problem with swig for php... >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for the update. It builds and installs fine here on two boxes >>>>> with 10.0-CURRENT (amd64). >>>>> >>>>> One issue which should be thought about before updating gdal in the >>>>> ports: >>>>> >>>>> Does gdal-1.9.1 really needs swig 2.0? It seems so for at least >>>>> libkml? >>>>> >>>>> The problem is, that in your Makefile swig 2.0 conflicts with an >>>>> installed swig 1.3.40, which is needed for example by graphics/geos, >>>>> graphics/graphviz, math/saga, science/py-scipy and some others. >>>>> >>>>> Affected ports can be found for example with >>>>> find /usr/ports -name Makefile -depth 3 -exec grep -l -e "swig13" >>>>> {} \; >>>>> >>>>> I personally would prefer the newer swig 2.0 version (even for most >>>>> other ports). Do you think it is necessary to forbid a parallel swig >>>>> 1.3.40 installation in your port? I read somewhere that both swig >>>>> ports >>>>> can coexist in principle, only some docs share the same places (which >>>>> should be changed, of course). >>>>> >>>> >>>> Maybe you're right. I've see on trac.osgeo.org that it uses >>>> swig-1.3.40. >>>> I will try without specify version of swig. >>> >>> I saw in the news on http://www.swig.org/, that swig 2.0.6 is out with >>> many bug fixes and enhancements for templates and target languages like >>> php and python. Perhaps swig 2.0.6 is ready now for gdal? >> >> I made a patch to update from swig 2.0.4 to 2.0.6. Could you please try >> if at least some of the observed problems will disappear? >> >> If this helps we should create a PR and ask the maintainer for an update. >> >>> I just checked, that swig 1.3.40 and 2.0.4 should be able to coexist at >>> the same time. At least they do not share any filenames. >> > > The patch works but don't solve gdal problems. I think i've found were > it's wrong. > > For Ruby/Swig : > See the page on GDAL : http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/GdalOgrInRuby > SWIG 2 is required to build the Ruby bindings against Ruby 1.9.2. (SWIG > 1.3.40 is fine for Ruby 1.8.7) > > When i try to compile, i've two errors : > > "ogr_wrap.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol' can not be > used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC > ogr_wrap.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol' can not be > used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC" > For MDB driver (and for java port) it's needed some java stuff, but i don't use java and so don't understand what to do (http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/GdalOgrInJavaBuildInstructionsUnix)