From owner-freebsd-chat  Sat Jun 14 15:32:24 1997
Return-Path: <owner-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA13609
          for chat-outgoing; Sat, 14 Jun 1997 15:32:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.interlog.com (root@smtp.interlog.com [198.53.145.6])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA13601
          for <chat@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 14 Jun 1997 15:32:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ip220-28.cc.interlog.com (ip220-28.cc.interlog.com [207.34.220.28]) by smtp.interlog.com (8.8.3/8.7.6) with SMTP id SAA23921 for <chat@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 14 Jun 1997 18:32:13 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 1997 18:32:13 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199706142232.SAA23921@smtp.interlog.com>
X-Sender: paulg@mail.interlog.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: chat@FreeBSD.ORG
From: Paul Griffith <paulg@interlog.com>
Subject: The Berkeley Alternative
Sender: owner-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

You all might want to take a look at:

http://www.plesman.com/reviews/l1ccrv05.htm

It from the June 9, 1997 issue of Computing Canada, it gives a good write up
on FreeBSD. Here are a few select quotes:

"The chief difference between FreeBSD and Linux is quality control. Linux
tends to be a bit more advanced, experimental and consequently, sometines a
little less stable. The more conserative FreeBSD concentrates on stable
releases and has a reputation for being rock solid"

"By all account Linux and FreeBSD, combined are growing at the same rate as
NT Server"

Paul Griffith - paulg@interlog.com