From owner-freebsd-ports  Sat Nov  3  1:11:28 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3DE7837B40B; Sat,  3 Nov 2001 01:11:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from petef@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) id fA391q756687;
	Sat, 3 Nov 2001 01:01:52 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from petef)
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 01:01:52 -0800 (PST)
From: <petef@FreeBSD.org>
Message-Id: <200111030901.fA391q756687@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: ernst@heinz.jollem.com, petef@FreeBSD.org, analyzed@FreeBSD.org,
	freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/27358: Naming scheme for JDK ports (java)
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-ports.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-ports>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-ports>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Synopsis: Naming scheme for JDK ports (java)

State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: petef
State-Changed-When: Sat Nov 3 01:01:34 PST 2001
State-Changed-Why: 
Since we already have the IBM port in as linux-ibm-jdk13, should we keep this
open?


Responsible-Changed-From-To: analyzed->freebsd-ports
Responsible-Changed-By: petef
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Nov 3 01:01:34 PST 2001
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
Oops, braino

http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=27358

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message