From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 20 15:11:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2788116A4CE for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 15:11:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailhub.intercaf.ru (mailhub.intercaf.ru [195.96.167.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5031743D46 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 15:11:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lesha@intercaf.ru) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (ppp83-237-11-6.pppoe.mtu-net.ru [83.237.11.6]) (authenticated bits=0) by mailhub.intercaf.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5KFB616015865 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 19:11:07 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from lesha@intercaf.ru) From: AK Organization: InterCAF To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 19:11:21 +0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406201911.21044.lesha@intercaf.ru> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 'clamd / ClamAV version 0.65', clamav-milter version '0.60p' Subject: Does ipl.ko require INET6? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 15:11:21 -0000 Hello, everyone! # kldload ipl link_elf: symbol in6_cksum undefined Does it mean that INET6 is a must for ipl to work? AL. (currently rebuilding kernel with INET6, which I don't need)