From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Nov 16 16:20:22 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63DE7967
 for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:20:22 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from freebsd@hub.org)
Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 187408FC13
 for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:20:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.151.189])
 by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 397D21C722EA;
 Fri, 16 Nov 2012 12:20:21 -0400 (AST)
Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220])
 by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.151.189]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 63762-05; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:20:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.52] (S01060026f3ee6b97.gv.shawcable.net
 [96.54.43.95]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9AB761C722E9;
 Fri, 16 Nov 2012 12:20:18 -0400 (AST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
Subject: Re: Unified BSD?
From: Hub- FreeBSD <freebsd@hub.org>
In-Reply-To: <50A64530.2080808@update.uu.se>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 08:20:17 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5C65B46F-174E-4BCB-A3C8-BCCA950805B5@hub.org>
References: <CAOc+9seWtWaw=bx+KwjKXjULArijgcvbDR1gi_J+SQkFfsHTCA@mail.gmail.com>
 <AE3F3CAD-1785-4363-8266-AC11775A52DF@gmail.com>
 <20121113104511.GA2362@cs.uni-bonn.de> <50A5F994.9080307@mu.org>
 <1C35F6E4-4A43-43C4-8256-17C58E8F8F01@hub.org>
 <CAK3FJdm9fSCRPHBzqEvRUtKBwmkieCbYaeTLLy_g2EKobsF0GA@mail.gmail.com>
 <50A64530.2080808@update.uu.se>
To: Johnny Billquist <bqt@update.uu.se>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Cc: Joost van de Griek <gyorpb@gmail.com>, Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>,
 misc@openbsd.org, users@dragonflybsd.org, netbsd-users@netbsd.org,
 tomas.bodzar@gmail.com, Ignatios Souvatzis <ignatios@cs.uni-bonn.de>,
 freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Non technical items related to the community
 <freebsd-chat.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-chat>,
 <mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-chat>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat>,
 <mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:20:22 -0000


On 2012-11-16, at 5:52 AM, Johnny Billquist <bqt@update.uu.se> wrote:

> On 2012-11-16 12:48, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Hub- FreeBSD <freebsd@hub.org> =
wrote:
>>>=20
>>> Actually, according to what we are tracking at http://bsdstats.org, =
there are currently *8*:
>>>=20
>>> PC-BSD
>>> FreeBSD
>>> PYC-BSD (aka Rus-BSD)
>>> DesktopBSD
>>> OpenBSD
>>> NetBSD
>>> DragonflyBSD
>>> MidnightBSD
>>>=20
>>=20
>> Tracking something like DesktopBSD which doesn't exist for quite a
>> long time make statistics not much useful. MidnightBSD seems to be
>> same case as last activy on mailing list last year in May, forums
>> doesn't working at all so we are still on 4 core BSDs
>> (Open/Net/Free/Dfly).
>=20
> I find it rather meaningless as a tracking tool for BSD in general. =
There is no way something like 2BSD would ever appear there, no matter =
how many systems were installed.
>=20
> And I also do happen to consider OS-X to be a BSD system. :-)

I agree on that point, which is why I run it for my desktops =85 but =
until you mention it, I'd never thought of even trying to get the script =
to run =85 have to play with that this weekend and see how "out of the =
box" it works, if it does =85