From owner-freebsd-atm Tue Jul 27 13:42:29 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Received: from mercury.dnai.com (mercury.dnai.com [207.181.194.99]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72ED2153BD for ; Tue, 27 Jul 1999 13:42:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from aditya@mercury.dnai.com) Received: from mercury (aditya@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.dnai.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA15644; Tue, 27 Jul 1999 13:40:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199907272040.NAA15644@mercury.dnai.com> To: atm@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Mark Tinguely From: "R.P. Aditya" Reply-To: "R.P. Aditya" Subject: Re: NIC questions In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 27 Jul 1999 15:05:47 -0500. <199907272005.PAA27670@plains.NoDak.edu> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 13:40:11 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > home stations: > > another driving force for ATM in FreeBSD is xDSL services. DSL uses SNAP/LLC > (which appears to be real easy addition) and/or PPP over ATM (a kernel-only > implementation would be moderately easy). some vendors claim support for > RFC2225 (was RFC1577) Classic IP over ATM and Native ATM, but IMO, these > are could-a, should-a would-a marketing talk. www.xpeed.com -- they claim to have a PCI NIC with drivers for *BSD (vaporware as far as I can tell, so far) that will have SDSL support by the end of the year for Nokia/DiamondLane DSLAMs (they currently support Copper Mountain DSLAMs). I'd like to do PPP-over-ATM with such NICs and a kernel-only-implementation would be wonderful... Thanks, Adi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message