From owner-freebsd-chat Wed Jun 23 12:55:48 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from smtp11.bellglobal.com (smtp11.bellglobal.com [204.101.251.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF52F1560F for ; Wed, 23 Jun 1999 12:55:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from vanderh@ecf.toronto.edu) Received: from ppp18341.on.bellglobal.com (ppp18378.on.bellglobal.com [206.172.130.58]) by smtp11.bellglobal.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA08091; Wed, 23 Jun 1999 15:58:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from tim@localhost) by ppp18341.on.bellglobal.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id PAA54526; Wed, 23 Jun 1999 15:55:34 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tim) Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 15:55:33 -0400 From: Tim Vanderhoek To: Mike Avery Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PR broken? was Re: Linux not FreeBSD? Message-ID: <19990623155533.B54446@ppp18341.on.bellglobal.com> References: <199906231621.LAA26271@hostigos.otherwhen.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i In-Reply-To: <199906231621.LAA26271@hostigos.otherwhen.com>; from Mike Avery on Wed, Jun 23, 1999 at 11:16:28AM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Jun 23, 1999 at 11:16:28AM -0500, Mike Avery wrote: > > Labelling Brett's comments SPAM, and silencing Brett will remove his > voice.... but doing that will have no effect on the reality of whether Just so DES doesn't have to point this out himself, he was joking about censoring anyone from -chat as being a spammer... Of course, it _was_ a polite request for subscribers not to go on the particular tangent that they are currently following. Hehe. Remarkably polite, all things considered. :) -- This is my .signature which gets appended to the end of my messages. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message