From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 8 23:28:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07AD16A421 for ; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 23:28:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (creme-brulee.marcuscom.com [24.172.16.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 863A343D5A for ; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 23:28:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from shumai.marcuscom.com (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) by creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j98NSeix085729; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 19:28:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: "Mikhail T." In-Reply-To: <200510051413.j95EDBi2038518@blue.virtual-estates.net> References: <200510051413.j95EDBi2038518@blue.virtual-estates.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-4yJ2yuhJp/NtZUuHDSPT" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 19:28:17 -0400 Message-Id: <1128814097.47852.10.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ${PREFIX}/include/nss/nss X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 23:28:27 -0000 --=-4yJ2yuhJp/NtZUuHDSPT Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 10:13 -0400, Mikhail T. wrote: > Hi! >=20 > I just noticed, that there is nothing under /usr/local/include/nss other > than another nss subdirectory. Fixing this is trivial -- we are only > installing nss headers -- but the impact on the dependant ports may not > be. >=20 > It is still desirable, though, IMHO... Yes, but as you pointed out, it will require changes to the NSS-dependent ports (as well as plist changes to security/nss itself). If you want to test all the ports, and submit a complete patch, that would be great. >=20 > While at it, there is, probably, no need to make the libraries > executable nor to strip them -- use INSTALL_DATA instead of > INSTALL_PROGRAM. I disagree. Shared libraries should be stripped as is done in virtually every other port. Making shared objects executable is not required, through. Joe --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-4yJ2yuhJp/NtZUuHDSPT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDSFYRb2iPiv4Uz4cRAhLSAKCOYVHEJV92DHoDDTLCLTmpdTeaDACeJeZT 9ZA0jAHCTUiG/b4H4EIDD2Y= =44w6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-4yJ2yuhJp/NtZUuHDSPT--