From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 7 21:16:05 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A12D5824 for ; Sat, 7 Jun 2014 21:16:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BF1A22C1 for ; Sat, 7 Jun 2014 21:16:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([87.139.233.65]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LuxG5-1WkHDJ2Hdx-0108x7; Sat, 07 Jun 2014 23:15:56 +0200 Message-ID: <53938114.9060303@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2014 23:16:04 +0200 From: olli hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: How are ports built now References: <20140607202241.GA59544@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:w+QQQoRPPb+7CyHXtGDXmgqpqAsr6MAdbp3t86jDU8Kjh0+A/cM wFb5u+vlE5Os9Q43h4S/YtlgIBa702pRcG+MhMpYRtZLAcPmy5HVQpDVvKSioTHzUT2LaP7 YQqoToONqO9ds3TTJ9BqPwfnEKfY6lbrFxDNDa1GicI/NO9fW7jc1nZFZ1172zhWQUnXrfI VB7YQLijjeHDn+zZPe7QA== Cc: Paul Schmehl X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2014 21:16:05 -0000 On 2014-06-07 22:40, Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On June 7, 2014 at 10:22:41 PM +0200 "A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven" wrote: > >> Paul Schmehl wrote: >> >>> Recently I upgraded two servers to 8.4 and implemented the pkgng system. >> [snip] >>> Is portmaster not the appropriate method for updating ports with pkgng? >> >> It depends whether you're talking about *building* packages from the ports >> tree or installing binary packages. >> >> As for building from ports, Portmaster doesn't care whether you're using >> the new PNGNG or the old pkg_* tools. >> > > Thanks. That's good to know. > >>> Now, when I run portmaster -ad, it seems to keep reinstalling the same >>> ports over and over again. >> >> That's strange. Perhaps PKGNG hasn't been initialised properly on your >> system(s), that's all I can think of at the moment. Did you use pkg2ng? >> > > I'm pretty sure I did, but I ran it again. I noticed several errors which I will have to investigate. > Do you see which port is looping? Perhaps a port was moved / renamed / removed and portmaster therfore is looping around Sadly I cannot help more since I used all the years tinderbox / poudriere to build packages. -- Regards, olli