From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 11:02:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF8516A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 11:02:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ggajic@afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu) Received: from afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu (afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu [147.91.1.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759A743D48 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 11:02:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ggajic@afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu) Received: from afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1CB2mDd003329 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 12 Feb 2006 12:02:48 +0100 Received: from localhost (ggajic@localhost) by afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k1CB2jKi003325; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 12:02:47 +0100 Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 12:02:45 +0100 (CET) From: Goran Gajic To: "Frank J. Laszlo" In-Reply-To: <43EE6E5D.4090202@vonostingroup.com> Message-ID: References: <43EE6E5D.4090202@vonostingroup.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-RCUB-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the RCUB if you have problem with mail X-RCUB-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-RCUB-MailScanner-From: ggajic@afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Microwindows (nano-x) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 11:02:56 -0000 I don't see any licensing reason (it is undere MPL licence - http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/), and of course that you can use my patch. Note that build done using src/Config/config.freebsd requires vesa.ko to be loaded. There is option to use libsvga too but I haven't tried it yet. Regrads, gg. On Sat, 11 Feb 2006, Frank J. Laszlo wrote: > Any particular reason why there isn't a port for this? License issues? I'd be > willing to write a port for it if you don't mind me using your patch. > > Regards, > Frank >