From owner-freebsd-current Mon Apr 23 14:33:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mass.dis.org (mass.dis.org [216.240.45.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B3D37B424; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 14:33:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Received: from mass.dis.org (msmith@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.dis.org (8.11.3/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f3NLUBq16448; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 14:30:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Message-Id: <200104232130.f3NLUBq16448@mass.dis.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Warner Losh Cc: John Baldwin , "David W. Chapman Jr." , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kernel core In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 23 Apr 2001 14:34:59 MDT." <200104232035.f3NKZ0875481@harmony.village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 14:30:11 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > In message <200104211839.f3LIdGC01045@mass.dis.org> Mike Smith writes: > : I assume there's a better fix in the works, so that a "dirpref-touched" > : disk can be moved back to a pre-dirpref system? > > If not, then dirpref should be backed out, imho. I'd have to agree; this was a pretty poorly-thought-out aspect of the change. -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message