From owner-freebsd-vuxml@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 25 16:33:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-vuxml@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 741B716A4CE; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 16:33:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gw.celabo.org (gw.celabo.org [208.42.49.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EFF243D41; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 16:33:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nectar@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gw.celabo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B29B75487F; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:33:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: from gw.celabo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hellblazer.celabo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with SMTP id 47610-07; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:33:45 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [10.0.1.107] (lum.celabo.org [10.0.1.107]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by gw.celabo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F12D45487E; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:33:44 -0500 (CDT) In-Reply-To: <86914F26-F516-11D8-8CAA-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> References: <86914F26-F516-11D8-8CAA-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <825857C8-F6B4-11D8-9236-000A95BC6FAE@FreeBSD.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jacques Vidrine Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:33:34 -0500 To: Oliver Eikemeier X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: freebsd-vuxml@FreeBSD.org cc: Tom Rhodes Subject: Re: making optional X-BeenThere: freebsd-vuxml@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documenting security issues in VuXML List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 16:33:56 -0000 On Aug 23, 2004, at 10:10 AM, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > I have a supplementary databases that are as much `personal' as vuxml > is. The portaudit text database has been announced and documented as > mentioned in a previous discussion. I'm sorry, I couldn't find that text (`Please contact [...]') anywhere in portaudit.txt or related files. Now I realize that is generated in the pages at ~eik/portaudit. I think we're on the same page now. > Anyway, I think making the entry optional would be the best solution, > but if you prefer a placeholder, we can keep `Please contact the > FreeBSD Security Team for more information'. I prefer an actual description, but OK :-) > Whatever you like. Simply using dummy values is fine with me. For the sake of harmony, let's agree that setting unknown is acceptable for now. Gimme a few days to check that stuff doesn't break when processing said entry. Cheers, -- Jacques A Vidrine / NTT/Verio nectar@celabo.org / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@freebsd.org