From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 24 09:01:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F62316A4CE for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:01:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailtoaster1.pipeline.ch (mailtoaster1.pipeline.ch [62.48.0.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88E4C43D31 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:01:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 38850 invoked from network); 24 Jun 2004 09:01:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [62.48.0.47]) ([62.48.0.47]) (envelope-sender ) by mailtoaster1.pipeline.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 24 Jun 2004 09:01:36 -0000 Message-ID: <40DA986B.6080108@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:01:31 +0200 From: Andre Oppermann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040608 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug White References: <20040620134437.P94503@fw.reifenberger.com> <20040622155106.C79584@carver.gumbysoft.com> <200406230114.19277.max@love2party.net> <20040623201914.B92305@carver.gumbysoft.com> In-Reply-To: <20040623201914.B92305@carver.gumbysoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Max Laier cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Garance A Drosihn Subject: Re: _ users [Was: startup error for pflogd] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:01:59 -0000 Doug White wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Max Laier wrote: > >>>I think its quite doable for 6.x; this gives ports a chance to get on >>>board without having a huge rush before 5.3 hits the street. >> >>I completely agree with you here. My question is, what should I do with >>pflogd? I don't see much point in creating user pflogd now, patching pflogd >>to use it and revert everything back for 6-current. So will it be much of a >>problem to add _pflogd now eventhough the rest of the daemons is not yet >>converted? > > Well, everything else is going to have to get patched too, so pflogd will > just ride the megacommit. :-) > > How many places is the username referenced in the code? I wouldn't think > it would pop up more than a couple of times. Or just make it a #define. That'd be the easier way to go. I'm sure Daniel is going to see the justification for this and feed that back to OpenBSD as well. -- Andre