From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 8 20:41:23 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6ABF33A9 for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2014 20:41:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from spectrum.skysmurf.nl (spectrum.skysmurf.nl [82.95.125.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB93C26EC for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2014 20:41:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from spectrum.skysmurf.nl (mail.skysmurf.nl [192.168.42.4] (may be forged)) by spectrum.skysmurf.nl (8.14.7/8.14.7) with SMTP id s58KfH3V053084; Sun, 8 Jun 2014 22:41:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@skysmurf.nl) Received: by spectrum.skysmurf.nl (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 08 Jun 2014 22:41:17 +0200 Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2014 22:41:17 +0200 From: "A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven" To: Jim Pazarena Subject: Re: pkg 2 ng conversion Message-ID: <20140608204117.GB52968@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> References: <5394A105.5040006@paz.bz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="b5gNqxB1S1yM7hjW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5394A105.5040006@paz.bz> X-PGP-Key: http://www.skysmurf.nl/~fonz/fonz_pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2014 20:41:23 -0000 --b5gNqxB1S1yM7hjW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jim Pazarena wrote: > this process is a little confusing. > do I still need to run "portsnap fetch" ? PKGNG is a packaging system, not a building system. If you need a ports tree (usually for BUILDING ports/packages from source, although there are other reasons occasionally), then yes, you need to do a # portsnap fetch extract or alternatively obtain a ports tree through Git or Subversion. If you don't need a ports tree (for example because you'll only be installing binary packages from a repository and don't need a ports tree for other reasons), there's no need to use Portsnap either. AvW --=20 I'm not completely useless, I can be used as a bad example. --b5gNqxB1S1yM7hjW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTlMptAAoJEAfP7gJTaCe8ms4P/RlkSiU/3NxpQczgG/1IdELk ALesBtvJIo7KEILPi10gxds4NbrNGyL55oXC7MF87TeE9gSJFKGTPYLzJNhhLfb5 /iMpvD//TVOq1XXVEl6vNkgGRo9O7tDuG7/+XFBiKPjjqpV85nogKgLRywwN1QZq 0fX+wqME58XGolRXrEkf2gOlbzEufXwiKo8lDan0x9blcEBoZE8TjpyihS/s5mQn taGMMPJEkk4PcFyv45EUcsLfGkOKPDtQX9GDJEMxZypC9Q725qUjHjhyraVVfLiA AhSaqZnnW61PvDjmXLFpdvLZm8a8QEN3yMqCjCdvSo5B8BKWmFF8Y19X8n3EtJGh QYD0YExbt3kieQrUGbb3eFuGnlRljpbuuBaSC01PWRHzXqSyCoRJFjoY8FWsNk5U 26Xch86svRRL5DBm5qH+S2mU5xr+aGfukEOGylV7ufOHcMe+z4rn372igsAL4gSE zAm/QNEjv5ki+yM+tjNoBsI58u6ZsHKnuziguLZ4uTuSn3PoBXomj+ilBjrpVGT2 7SiJPn/0GIxFFBAtavIievFIiY5qs1ycyJs6tXWiaUPtV7D2GOmycsKlMFsZGvfh xcIPVnn3gISGz5SOr2etCUykl53xjb2ViQrc6OOmDfpFOMHRB+Jb/wZSJhCITem/ lusN4Uc1fZRo9B+8jx2U =0YBG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --b5gNqxB1S1yM7hjW--