From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Mar 14 01:57:35 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id BAA05534 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 14 Mar 1995 01:57:35 -0800 Received: from mail.euronet.nl (mail.euronet.nl [193.67.112.150]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id BAA05528 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 1995 01:57:30 -0800 Received: from p324.euronet.nl (p324.euronet.nl [193.67.112.119]) by mail.euronet.nl (8.6.4.1/A/UX 3.1) with SMTP id KAA04608 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 1995 10:57:25 +0100 Date: Tue, 14 Mar 1995 10:57:25 +0100 Message-Id: <199503140957.KAA04608@mail.euronet.nl> X-Sender: jg@mail.euronet.nl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: questions@FreeBSD.org From: jg@euronet.nl (Jan_Guldemond) Subject: Sources X-Mailer: Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi, I need to rebuild my kernel, because of some changes to be made in irq-settings. On the ftp site (mirrored in my own country) only 2.0 and 2.0 (SNAP 10-2) are available. Which version of FreeBSD do you recommen to use for a Internet-server. It's very improtant that the system is 24 hours a day available. So I can't use a buggy FreeBSD version. Also the machine is located in a builiding with no personel, so when the systems crashes I have to drive over. Should I use 2.0, 2.0 (SNAP 2-2), 2.0 (SNAP 10-2), or 1.1.5.1. I've heard that 1.1.5.1 is much more stable than 2.0 (and the SNAP's). Is this true?? I don't use much of the facilities, only the daemons used for an Internet-server, so I don't need the newest version if an older version does what it has to do for me. Any suggestions on what version to use? PLEASE REPLY, so I can make up my mind using your suggestions.