From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org  Wed May 18 01:13:43 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E92DB4015F
 for <freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Wed, 18 May 2016 01:13:43 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org)
Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ADF71942
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 18 May 2016 01:13:43 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org)
Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346)
 id 9024A16214; Wed, 18 May 2016 01:13:42 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 01:13:42 +0000
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
From: "sepherosa_gmail.com (Sepherosa Ziehau)" <phabric-noreply@FreeBSD.org>
Reply-to: D6406+325+76b767348064de43@reviews.freebsd.org
Subject: [Differential] D6406: mbuf: Add a flag for M_HASHTYPE_ to indicate
 the type has hash properties
Message-ID: <b5c7752ea23c225cb90a868a44946bd5@localhost.localdomain>
X-Priority: 3
X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes
X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: <differential-comment>
Thread-Topic: D6406: mbuf: Add a flag for M_HASHTYPE_ to indicate the type has
 hash properties
X-Herald-Rules: none
X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-owbigh336siepsaab2ye>
X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-PROJ-62ihepuxzgyzg7rh5uic>
X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-wmu3dipuua4kxljjqlii>
X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-n3y55yy4j7xarsdk3otz>
X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-xs5piezwnsa6epounp3t>
X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-sfbxp2cksgub2ywlvupr>
X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-ogl2udicsobdviqdulu3>
X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-nb2boxugvmpo7syia5md>
X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-ug3kdqciycpghwfscl6v>
X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-3chbbds7jbl2e23f44bm>
X-Phabricator-Cc: <PHID-USER-mdwvnzzsrozqcmzhmbra>
X-Phabricator-Cc: <PHID-USER-dyyyzfp34mimhzvg33tk>
Precedence: bulk
In-Reply-To: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-xuh5f6dfxihqp2pzh5pn-req@FreeBSD.org>
References: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-xuh5f6dfxihqp2pzh5pn-req@FreeBSD.org>
Thread-Index: NTE3YjE0YWU1ZTZhYmMwODc0YTM1NDI5ZGZkIFc7wcY=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 01:13:43 -0000

sepherosa_gmail.com added a comment.


  In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6406#136051, @gallatin wrote:
  
  > So the real goal here is to be able to express to the LRO code that you have a hash that is usable as a hash (eg, not just an ordinal queue index), and yet warn the RSS code that it is not a toeplitz rss hash result.   Is that correct?
  
  
  Yeah

REVISION DETAIL
  https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6406

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: sepherosa_gmail.com, #network, adrian, delphij, rwatson, gnn, glebius, rrs, bz, gallatin
Cc: hselasky, freebsd-net-list