From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 27 19:02:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C786F1065688 for ; Wed, 27 May 2009 19:02:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: from smtp.knology.net (smtp.knology.net [24.214.63.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E07F8FC21 for ; Wed, 27 May 2009 19:02:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: (qmail 12876 invoked by uid 0); 27 May 2009 19:02:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Grumpy.DynDNS.org) (24.42.224.110) by smtp7.knology.net with SMTP; 27 May 2009 19:02:30 -0000 Received: by Grumpy.DynDNS.org (Postfix, from userid 928) id ADA7428435; Wed, 27 May 2009 14:02:30 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 14:02:30 -0500 From: David Kelly To: Kirk Strauser Message-ID: <20090527190230.GB9937@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> References: <4A1AA3DC.5020300@network-i.net> <200905271048.27837.kirk@strauser.com> <200905271152.34237.kirk@strauser.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200905271152.34237.kirk@strauser.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Wojciech Puchar , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD & Software RAID X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 19:02:33 -0000 On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:52:33AM -0500, Kirk Strauser wrote: > On Wednesday 27 May 2009 11:40:51 am Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > > you talk about performance or if it work at all? > > Both, really. If they have to code up macros to support identical > operations (such as addition) on both platforms, and accidentally > forget to use the macro in some place, then voila: untested code. I haven't looked at the ZFS code but this sort of thing is exactly why all code I write uses int8_t, int16_t, int32_t, uint8_t, ... even when the first thing I have to do with a new compiler is to work out the proper typedefs to create them. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad.