From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 6 19:58:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB0C16A400 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2007 19:58:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 280FA13C469 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2007 19:58:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998E85194F for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2007 15:58:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 20:58:13 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070706205813.162eef64@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <468E9C5F.8020709@boosten.org> References: <468E6BE2.3010203@slightlystrange.org> <24bb2a0d0d4ebbfb6c86b9cc566e8145@szalbot.homedns.org> <20070706204358.15bd7730@gumby.homeunix.com.> <468E9C5F.8020709@boosten.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.13; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: parental control with squid and dansguardian X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 19:58:21 -0000 On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 21:47:43 +0200 Peter Boosten wrote: > RW wrote: > > On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 18:26:36 +0200 > > Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > > > > > >> Great! Thank you so much! Now this should really speed me up nd it > >> is perfect solution as no client configuration is needed and no > >> escaping possible! Thanks again! > > > > > > Unless they reconfigure their browser to use one of the numerous > > free proxy servers. > > The answer to that problem is quite easy: deny all direct access to > the internet on your gateway. In which case there isn't much point in transparent proxying because the browser will need to use the proxy for https and FTP.