From owner-freebsd-questions  Mon Feb  5 13:12:27 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA24891
          for questions-outgoing; Mon, 5 Feb 1996 13:12:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ns3.noc.netcom.net (ns3.noc.netcom.net [204.31.1.3])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA24886
          for <questions@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 5 Feb 1996 13:12:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tera.com (tera.tera.com [206.215.142.10]) by ns3.noc.netcom.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id NAA22101; Mon, 5 Feb 1996 13:10:15 -0800
Received: from athena.tera.com by tera.com (4.1/SMI-4.0-206)
	id AA06324; Mon, 5 Feb 96 13:09:47 PST
From: kline@tera.com (Gary Kline)
Message-Id: <9602052109.AA06324@tera.com>
Subject: Re: Linux Compatibility
To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert)
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 1996 13:10:00 -0800 (PST)
Cc: JSINNOTT@POMONA.EDU, questions@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <199602052005.NAA11918@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at Feb 5, 96 01:05:02 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

According to Terry Lambert:
> 
> > Exactly how complete is the Linux compatibility?  Will only some applications
> > run, or will all?  Thanks
> 
> Only the vast majority of them will run.  8-).
> 
> 

	Forgive me for asking what might be a silly question,
	but is there any reason why FreeBSD cannot be configured
	to exec Linux binaries by default?   

	gary kline