From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 22:21:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 176A216A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 22:21:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AADC943D1D for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 22:21:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pergesu@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 37so395952wra for ; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 15:21:11 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=T8UndPTejR9fattd+0+WMtnjkEXhJVj9tkRXiNYqj+3AfwbDOr1idac9asDCvruOz12fsIxX+9hq1B8RyLaJ5YkVhAVO1bBRw15KW8hQr/yNvXp8i21lNXMJErGFwezkmV3Q95drTT8mcr0TH/Pxdo4wFXm4ICIwfGuSj6hva+4= Received: by 10.54.25.60 with SMTP id 60mr237214wry; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 15:21:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.42.28 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:21:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <810a540e050406152124462c81@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 16:21:11 -0600 From: Pat Maddox To: FreeBSD Questions In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <44hdil8bn2.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Subject: Re: Maintaining a Minimal Installation for a Small HDD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Pat Maddox List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 22:21:12 -0000 Yep, that's pretty much right. Use one of the systems to build everything as packages, and then install all those packages onto your other machines. You'll still need to compile the kernel and source on each individual machine. On Apr 6, 2005 4:18 PM, Iain Dooley wrote: > hi lowell, > > >The recommended path is to do a binary upgrade. 5.4 will be out in a > >few weeks, and release candidate builds are available now. > > to what extent does building the sources on my machine affect the resulting > binaries? to be more specific: > > i read the freebsd handbook section on maintaining multiple systems from one > 'build machine'. if i were to allocate one of the machines on my network to > build sources into binaries, say my HP PII, would those binaries be > appropriate to install on my thinkpad? my understanding is that i could take > a subset of those binaries and install them on my laptop, and then build the > kernel from the thinkpad and this would work (assuming i got all the > binaries right). is that correct? > > cheers > > iain > > _________________________________________________________________ > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! > http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >