From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun  9 15:32:33 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F09B2DD4
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon,  9 Jun 2014 15:32:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from relay.andxor.it (relay.andxor.it [78.134.40.50])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 418F3232E
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon,  9 Jun 2014 15:32:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 40730 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2014 15:32:23 -0000
Received: from alex.andxor.it (a.premoli@andxor.it@192.168.2.30)
 by relay.andxor.it with ESMTPSA; 9 Jun 2014 15:32:23 -0000
Message-ID: <5395D387.8020902@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 17:32:23 +0200
From: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: sbruno@freebsd.org, ports list <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: gcc vs gcc48
References: <1402327321.76875.8.camel@bruno>
In-Reply-To: <1402327321.76875.8.camel@bruno>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6.1_pre20140112
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 15:32:34 -0000

Sean Bruno ha scritto:
> Ended up in a weird position today running a build.  My poudriere
> instance ended up building gcc and gcc48 at the same time.
> 
> I thought this was odd.  Shouldn't gcc48 supplant gcc for requirements?

Every port is built independently from the others, so gcc48 is not found
when building other ports that doesn't strictly require it.

-- 
Alex Dupre