From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jun 25 8:56:35 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from yeoman.sinbad.net (yeoman.sinbad.net [12.17.176.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8724D37B408 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 08:56:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from there (95-7-237-24-cable.anchorageak.net [24.237.7.95]) by yeoman.sinbad.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CA6C20E93; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 07:56:00 -0800 (AKDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Beech Rintoul Reply-To: akbeech@sinbad.net To: "ro0t" , Subject: Re: any idea what this means? Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 07:55:59 -0800 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3] References: In-Reply-To: Organization: Sinbad Network Communications MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20020625155600.0CA6C20E93@yeoman.sinbad.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Monday 24 June 2002 11:53 pm, ro0t wrote: > On Monday 24 June 2002 11:13 pm, ro0t wrote: > > ad0s1d: hard error reading fsbn 135917743 of 29169720-29169723 (ad0s1 bn > 135917743; cn 8460 tn 124 sn 31) status=59 error=40 > I have never gotten this error before, is it the hard disk failing? if so > why is it just one partition doing it? please respond to > root@unixhideout.com as i am not on the list. Thanks. > > > That's not a good sign. It's not unusual for HD problems to start on one > partition. I would back up your drive and also check your cables for > tightness. > > Beech > > > Well i figured it wasn't a good sign. I tried "badsect" and it didnt do > me much good. I just hate to toss a 60 gig drive in the trash. But now more > blocks are just failing. This system has been running a year without any > errors. When i bought the motherboard, i bought the "ABIT KT7A-RAID" for > future plans, looks like the future is now. ill buy dual drives and raid it > up. Now im only left with the decision of whether to buy yet *more* maxtor > drives. It appears at least from my experience that the only hard drives > that permanently die on me in what seems a short time is maxtor drives.. My > seagate is still kicking like a champ. Any suggestions on what new brand i > buy? =] And lastly thanks for your response. > I would also recommend Seagate, they seem to hold up better in production machines than do Maxtor. Above all stay away from IBM. We have three of them that were bad almost right from the box, and IBM is not being nice about replacing them. I have beter things to do than a myriad of tests just to get an RMA. Being new drives I figure they should give us the benefit of the doubt and test them themselves. One they did replace had bad sectors right out of the box. Beech -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Beech Rintoul - SysAdmin - akbeech@sinbad.net /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Sinbad Network Communications \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 3101 Penland Parkway #K-38 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99508-1957 / \ ----------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message