From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 9 15:56:55 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 614A5CCA for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 15:56:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay.andxor.it (relay.andxor.it [78.134.40.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA9EA2563 for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 15:56:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46240 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2014 15:56:52 -0000 Received: from alex.andxor.it (a.premoli@andxor.it@192.168.2.30) by relay.andxor.it with ESMTPSA; 9 Jun 2014 15:56:52 -0000 Message-ID: <5395D944.8040402@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 17:56:52 +0200 From: Alex Dupre User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sbruno@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gcc vs gcc48 References: <1402327321.76875.8.camel@bruno> <5395D387.8020902@FreeBSD.org> <1402328895.76875.11.camel@bruno> In-Reply-To: <1402328895.76875.11.camel@bruno> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6.1_pre20140112 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports list X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 15:56:55 -0000 Sean Bruno ha scritto: > This seems like a broken "feature" of ports IMO. I.e. non-consistent > runs. It seems quite strange to me, poudriere shouldn't exhibits such behavior. -- Alex Dupre